Kimberly Konopelski

🇦🇺 Australia

9.4

Reviewed: November 8, 2023

• - Health Technology Assessment
• - 10 weeks September - November 2023
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The health technology assessment was thorough and provided valuable insights that were critical to our decision-making process. The team demonstrated a deep understanding of the health economics involved and delivered a well-rounded analysis.

Ebony Schimmel

🇯🇵 Japan

8.8

Reviewed: July 5, 2023

• - Biostatistical Design
• - 4 weeks May - June 2023
• - Research Institution

The biostatistical support provided was top-notch, offering clear and actionable insights that were critical to the success of our study. The team was responsive and worked closely with us to ensure the analysis met our specific needs.

Brian Carter V

🇹🇷 Turkey

6.2

Reviewed: March 15, 2024

• - Clinical Protocol Design
• - 10 weeks January - March 2024
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The protocol design process required multiple revisions due to inconsistencies in the deliverables. Although the team was responsive to feedback, the back-and-forth extended the timeline beyond what was originally agreed upon.

Marcella Morissette

🇺🇸 United States

5.6

Reviewed: February 20, 2024

• - Clinical Data Management
• - 8 weeks December 2023 - February 2024
• - Biotech Company

The data management services were delayed, and communication from the team was lacking. It was difficult to get updates, and when the deliverables arrived, they were not as polished as expected. The delays impacted our project timeline significantly.

Mary Torp

🇧🇷 Brazil

8.8

Reviewed: May 15, 2024

• - Companion Diagnostics Development
• - 16 weeks January - May 2024
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The development of companion diagnostics was of high quality, and the project was delivered on time. The team's technical expertise and understanding of the regulatory environment were key to the success of the project.